HOME CURRENT ISSUE BUYERS GUIDE SUBSCRIBE 2006 ADVERTISING INFO CONTACT THE STAFF


FREE PRODUCT INFO


• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

CONTENT CATEGORIES
Ready Mixed
Pipe and Precast
Masonry
Prestressed
Architectural Precast
Cast Stone

Certification
Legislative
Market Forecast
Regulatory

Cementitious Materials
Information Technology
Mix Technology


• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

E-MAIL NEWSLETTERS
Subscribe to Concrete Currents


• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

RESOURCES
Contact the Staff
Marketplace
2006 Advertising Information


• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

RELATED LINKS
Cement Americas
Rock Products
Industry Associations
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •







Q/A Archives

June 2006

M T W T F S S
    Jul »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Related Experts


Sign-up for RSS

Sign-Up for RSS

Sika Corporation

Admixtures

sponsored by Sika Corporation


Archive for June 9th, 2006

HRWR vs. PC based HRWR
Posted on June 9, 2006

What is the main difference between traditional High Range Water Reducers (HRWR) and polycarboxylate (PC) based HRWR.

Traditionally HRWR were either based on Naphthalene or Melamine. Today most of the new products are based on polycarboxylate polymers. These new products are still formulated to meet ASTM C-494 Type F or G. The biggest difference is the versatility in these new products. Since the polymers are synthesized, they can be specially designed for specific applications. No additional admixtures would be needed for higher earlier strength or longer slump retention. These PC-based products are also much more efficient in water reduction than traditional HRWR. Dosages for regular concrete applications are therefore lower and at higher dosages


1


 
Back to Top

blank
© 2006 Penton Media Inc. Contact Us | Advertising | For Search Partners | Privacy Policy
blank